We’ve all been there.
You have a crystal-clear idea in your head, and you turn to ChatGPT or Midjourney to bring it to life.
How hard can it be?
You type: “Generate an image of an orange cat stuck in a high tree. Make it look a bit like Garfield, and make it look quite scared.”
Attempt 1: The AI spits back a photorealistic, majestic Bengal tiger sitting on a stump, looking incredibly peaceful. You sigh. Let’s refine.
Attempt 2: “No, not a tiger. A cartoon orange cat. High up in a very tall oak tree. Looking terrified at the ground.” The AI gives you a cartoon cat, but it’s wearing a tuxedo, floating next to the tree, and holding a cup of coffee.
Attempt 14: “JUST AN ORANGE CAT. IN THE BRANCHES. SCARED OF HEIGHTS. LIKE GARFIELD.” The AI generates a demonic, multi-pawed lasagna monster fused into the bark of a pine tree.
Attempt 20: You stare at the screen, your cognitive battery flashing at 1%, and let out an audible, agonising scream: “NOOOO! That’s completely wrong!”
Why does this happen?
Because we fundamentally misunderstand what the tool is doing. We think we are designing something. We aren't. We are pulling the lever on a slot machine and hoping the right pixels fall out.
Generic AI doesn't understand your intent. It doesn't have an underlying architecture. It just has probabilities. So, you end up negotiating with it. You become a hostage to the prompt, constantly tweaking and begging the black box to give you the answer you already know you want.
As an auditor, you already know the exhaustion of Prompt #20. But you aren’t doing it with image generators, you are doing it with your entire audit methodology.
We treat our workbooks like that chat box. We drop messy data into a file and then we start negotiating. We tweak a formula here. We write a custom macro there. We beg the spreadsheet to behave. When it breaks, we try a different prompt. When the links sever at 11:00 PM on a Friday, we yell at the screen.
We spend our days arguing with our own tools, hoping they eventually guess what we need them to do.
A well-designed building doesn't require you to negotiate with the stairs every time you want to reach the second floor. It just takes you there.
True mastery in our profession means you stop acting like a prompt engineer trying to coax a result out of chaos. You shouldn't need twenty attempts, five workarounds, and a bespoke macro just to get your methodology to function.
You need infrastructure that knows exactly what you need, exactly when you need it. You need a foundation that imposes order from the very first click, completely eliminating the negotiation phase.
We don't need to politely ask our spreadsheets to work. We need environments that carry the weight of the methodology natively. When the architecture is right, the impossible becomes standard. You stop arguing with the tools, and you finally get back to the analysis.
Stop prompting. Start building.
Until next week,
Christiaan
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Help your team work faster in Microsoft Excel without
sacrificing control, traceability, or audit quality.
Inspiration not perspiration with tips and insights to audit smarter, straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time. We respect your information and won’t share your data with any 3rd parties. Learn more about our privacy policy.
.svg)
.png)
